How To Create a
Completely Automated
Shapiro-Wilk Normality
Test in Excel in 8 Steps
The purpose of this blog article is to show how to create a completely automated Shapiro-Wilk test for normality in Excel. The test is completely automated because the user has only to enter the raw, unsorted data sample to be tested for normality along with the alpha level desired for the test. Upon insertion of the sample data and alpha, the entire test will be automatically run and the test’s output will be immediately returned.
As with any hypothesis test, the output states whether to reject or not reject the Null Hypothesis and the specified alpha level. In this case, the Null Hypothesis states that the data sample came from a normally distributed population. This Null Hypothesis is rejected only if Test Statistic W is less than the critical value of W for a given alpha level and sample size.
Overview of the Shapiro-Wilk Test For Normality
The Shapiro-Wilk Test is a hypothesis test that is widely used to determine whether a data sample is normally distributed. A test statistic W is calculated. If this test statistic is less than a critical value of W for a given level of significance (alpha) and sample size, the Null Hypothesis which states that the sample comes from a normally distributed population is rejected. Keep in mind that passing a hypothesis test for normality only allows one to state that no significant departure from normality was found.
The Shapiro-Wilk Test is a robust normality test and is widely-used because of its slightly superior performance against other normality tests, especially with small sample sizes. Superior performance means that it correctly rejects the Null Hypothesis that the data are not normally distributed a slightly higher percentage of times than most other normality tests, particularly at small sample sizes.
The Shapiro-Wilk normality test is generally regarded as being slightly more powerful than the Anderson-Darling normality test, which in turn is regarded as being slightly more powerful than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test is affected by tied data values but less so than the Anderson-Darling normality test.
An abbreviated description of the steps of the Shapiro-Wilk normality test is as follows:
-
Sort the raw data in an ascending sort
-
Arrange the sorted data into pairs of successive highest and lowest data values
-
Calculate the difference between the high and low value of each pair
-
Multiply each difference by an “a Value” from a lookup table
-
Calculate test statistic W
-
Compare test statistic W with a W Critical Value obtained from a lookup table
-
Reject the Null Hypothesis stating normality only if W is smaller than W Critical
The complete Shapiro-Wilk test of normality appears in Excel as follows:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Step 1 – Sort Data in an Ascending Sort
Enter the Raw Data and Alpha Level
First, paste in the raw, unsorted data and set the alpha level in the yellow cells as follows:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
This Shapiro-Wilk normality test in Excel has the capability to handle up to 20 data points. This data sample contains only 15 data points but the Excel worksheet below indicates the capability for an additional 5 data points in the empty yellow cells. Expanding the capability of this Excel test to handle a larger number of data points would be a straightforward matter of making adjustments to the Excel formulas.
The alpha level should be set at 0.01, 0.05, or 0.10 because critical values of W are provided here only for those common alpha levels. If alpha is set at a different level, the following warning appears as a result of the If-Then-Else statement seen in the previous image:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Sort the Raw Data Using Formulas, Not the Excel Sorting Tool
The most efficient way to sort data is with the use of formulas as shown. The Excel sorting tool must be manually re-run whenever the raw data is changed in any way. The following formula will automatically resort the data if any data are changed or added. The following formulas produce an ascending sort. To create a descending sort, simply swap the word LARGE for SMALL within the formula.
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Step 2 – Obtain “a Values” From the “a Value Lookup Table”
The Table of a Values
The a Values are constants that are calculated from the means, variances, and covariances of the order statistics of a sample of size n from a normal distribution. The a Value table is shown as follows for data samples varying in size from n = 2 up to n = 50.
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Create Labels for the a Values
The first step in obtaining the correct a Values is to create the proper number of labels for the a Values.
The number of a Values needed depends on the sample size n. If n is an even number, the number of a Values equals n / 2. If n is an odd number, the number of a Values equals (n-1) / 2. This can be implemented with the following formulas:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Lookup a Values on the a Value Lookup Table
The a Values can now be looked up on the a Value table previously shown. An Index formula is a straightforward way implementing this. The Excel Index function is its simplest form has the following format:
Index(array, row number, column number) and returns the data value located in the specified row and column of the given array. The row and column number are relative to the cell in the upper-left corner of the array. Note that the array containing the a Values starts in cell H58 at the upper left corner and finishes in cell BE82 in the lower right corner.
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Step 3 – Pair Up Successive Highest-Lowest Data Values
Create X Labels for Data Sample Values
Each sorted data sample value will have an X Label. This is implemented with the following formulas:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
The following is a close-up of the formulas to create the labels for the X Values:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
The X Values are then obtained using the following formulas:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Create the Upper Value of Each Data Pair
The labels for the upper X Values of each data pair are created as follows:
The following is a close-up of the formulas to create the labels for the upper X Values:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
The upper X Values of each data pair are the obtained using the following set of formulas:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Here is a close-up of those formulas:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Create the Lower Value of Each Data Pair
The labels for the lower X Values of each data pair are created as follows:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
The following is a close-up of the formulas to create the labels for the lower X Values:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
The lower X Values of each data pair are the obtained using the following set of formulas:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Here is a close-up of those formulas:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Step 4 – Calculate the Difference Within Each Pair
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Here is a close-up of the difference formulas:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Step 5 – Calculate a * Difference
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Here is a close-up of those formulas:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Step 6 – Calculate b, SS, and Test Statistic W
b equals the sums of the product of a * pair difference.
SS is the sum of the squared deviations of x from the mean x. Excel formula DEVSQ() performs this.
Test Statistic W equals b2/SS.
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Here is a close-up of these formulas:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Step 7 – Lookup W Critical Values
Each unique combination of sample size and alpha level has its own critical W value. The following is a table of the respective critical W value for each combination of n and alpha up to a sample size of 50 and 3 common levels of alpha.
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Here is a close-up of the formulas. The If-Then-Else statement that looks up the critical W value is the following:
=IF(OR(B1=0.01,B1=0.05,B1=0.1),INDEX(BL18:BN67,U14,IF(U12=0.01,1,IF(U12=0.05,2,IF(U12=0.1,3)))),”alpha must be set to 0.01, 0.05, or 0.10”)
The INDEX() function looks up the critical W values in the array starting in cell BL18 in the upper left corner and ending in cell BN67 in the lower right corner.
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Step 8 – Determine Whether or Not To Reject Null Hypothesis By Comparing W to W Critical
The Null Hypothesis is rejected only if Test Statistic W is smaller the critical W value for the given sample size and alpha level. The Null Hypothesis states that the sample came from a normally distributed population. The Null Hypothesis is never accepted but only rejected or not rejected. Not rejecting the Null Hypothesis does not automatically imply that the population from which the sample was taken is normally distributed. This merely indicates that there is not even evidence to state that the population is likely not normally distributed for the given alpha level. As with all hypothesis tests, alpha = 1 - level of certainty. If a 95-percent level of certainty is required to reject the Null Hypothesis, the alpha level will be 0.05.
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Here is a close-up of the formulas to compare W with W Critical:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
The complete Shapiro-Wilk test of normality appears in Excel as follows:
(Click On Image To See a Larger Version)
Excel Master Series Blog Directory
Click Here To See a List Of All
Statistical Topics And Articles In
This Blog
You Will Become an Excel Statistical Master!